linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] dmaselftest: add memcpy selftest support functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5638E785.2070009@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 2015 11:57:41 -0500
From:	Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc:	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, cov@...eaurora.org, jcm@...hat.com,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] dmaselftest: add memcpy selftest support functions



On 11/3/2015 11:46 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> 1. Bug in ARM64 DMA subsystem.
>> 2. Bug in IOMMU driver.
>> 3. Bug in another newly introduced driver. The new driver would hog the
>> CPU and won't allow HIDMA interrupts to execute. Therefore, the test
>> times out.
>
> Which driver?
Some other driver that is not upstream yet.

>
> Wouldn't these problems already be exposed by dmatest?  I was asking
> whether it's possible that, every now and then, your DMA internal test
> could fail and then the driver would unload.  I'm not talking about hard
> bugs in other code that always causes the DMA driver test to fail.
>
The point is that dmatest is a kernel module that requires manual 
interaction. It does not run automatically and is generally used by the 
dma engine driver developer during development only.

Other developers like UART, SATA, USB, IOMMU etc. They don't care about 
dmatest and I have seen their changes broke self-test multiple times. I 
see the value of self test all the time.

I can make dma-self test a new kernel module. It could discover all DMA 
devices with MEMCPY capability and run a self test on them. We could 
tell the self test code deregister all DMA devices that fail the test.

I can also make it kernel command line dependent and disabled by 
default. Those who want this functionality all the time can change their 
kernel command line.

I hope this addresses concerns.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a 
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/