linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 1/1] efi: a misc char interface for user to update efi firmware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151103201455.GD3620@pd.tnic>
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 2015 21:14:55 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	"Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@...el.com>
Cc:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
	Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Roy Franz <roy.franz@...aro.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Fleming, Matt" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	"Anvin, H Peter" <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/1] efi: a misc char interface for user to update efi
 firmware

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 07:17:28AM +0000, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> This is not a return value to indicate what is going now. It is a flag
> used in "cap_info->index" which positive value has a meaning of index
> number. I am using the negative value for the flag which similar to
> the implementation of pointer & error pointer (ERR_PTR).

Ok, but that doesn't make any sense: you're assigning UPLOAD_DONE to
cap_info->index only once in efi_capsule_submit_update() and you're not
testing it anywhere. Yeah, yeah, you're implicitly testing for it by
doing the "< 0" check.

So simply assign -1 to ->index to mean *any* type of error occurred,
remove the defines and you can always test for "< 0" to mean "did
something fail".

You simply don't need two error values...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/