[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1446583017-19021-1-git-send-email-jarod@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 15:36:57 -0500
From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net/core: ensure features get disabled on new lower devs
With moving netdev_sync_lower_features() after the .ndo_set_features
calls, I neglected to verify that devices added *after* a flag had been
disabled on an upper device were properly added with that flag disabled as
well. This currently happens, because we exit __netdev_update_features()
when we see dev->features == features for the upper dev. We can retain the
optimization of leaving without calling .ndo_set_features with a bit of
tweaking and a goto here.
Changing err to ret was somewhat arbitrary and makes the patch look more
involved, but seems to better fit the altered use.
Fixes: fd867d51f ("net/core: generic support for disabling netdev features down stack")
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>
CC: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
CC: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 8ce3f74..90e0a62 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6402,7 +6402,7 @@ int __netdev_update_features(struct net_device *dev)
struct net_device *upper, *lower;
netdev_features_t features;
struct list_head *iter;
- int err = 0;
+ int ret = 0;
ASSERT_RTNL();
@@ -6419,31 +6419,34 @@ int __netdev_update_features(struct net_device *dev)
features = netdev_sync_upper_features(dev, upper, features);
if (dev->features == features)
- return 0;
+ goto sync_lower;
netdev_dbg(dev, "Features changed: %pNF -> %pNF\n",
&dev->features, &features);
if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_set_features)
- err = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_set_features(dev, features);
+ ret = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_set_features(dev, features);
- if (unlikely(err < 0)) {
+ if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
netdev_err(dev,
"set_features() failed (%d); wanted %pNF, left %pNF\n",
- err, &features, &dev->features);
+ ret, &features, &dev->features);
return -1;
}
+ if (!ret) {
+ dev->features = features;
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+
+sync_lower:
/* some features must be disabled on lower devices when disabled
* on an upper device (think: bonding master or bridge)
*/
netdev_for_each_lower_dev(dev, lower, iter)
netdev_sync_lower_features(dev, lower, features);
- if (!err)
- dev->features = features;
-
- return 1;
+ return ret;
}
/**
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists