linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf sched latency: Fix removed thread issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 Nov 2015 08:34:58 +0100
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mohit Agrawal <moagrawa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf sched latency: Fix removed thread issue

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:33:10PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:41:48AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 07:53:53PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:10:25PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > If machine's thread gets excited (EXIT event is received),
> > > > we set thread->dead = true and it is later on removed from
> > > > machine's tree if the pid is reused on new thread.
> > > 
> > > > The latency subcommand holds tree of working atoms sorted
> > > > by thread's pid/tid. If there's new thread with same pid
> > > 
> > > Humm, wher is the latency subcommand handling the EXIT event?
> > > 
> > > I see:
> > > 
> > >    perf_sched__lat
> > >      perf_sched__read_events
> > >        session = perf_session__new(&file, false, &sched->tool);
> > >        perf_session__process_events(session)
> > > 
> > > And sched->tool->exit() is not set, which will make
> > > perf_session__process_events(), when calling perf_tool__fill_defaults()
> > > set it to process_event_stub() which will do nothing for
> > > PERF_RECORD_EXIT events, no?
> > 
> > yep, latency command does not handle EXIT event, but the
> > thread is removed via FORK event.. the first changelog
> 
> So its not related to processing an EXIT event as described in the
> changelog, ok. And I don't see where is that thread->dead is set, i.e.
> the sequence is:
> 
>   machine__process_fork_event()
>     machine__remove_thread()
> 
> The only place where thread->dead is set to true is in thread__exited()
> and that is only called by machine__process_exit_event(), which is never
> called by 'perf sched'.
> 
> It is not "later removed from machine's tree", it is removed straight
> away, in __machine__remove_thread().

it is removed later via FORK event, as stated in changelog
and in updated changelog I sent in previous email:

SNIP

> > could you please change it to:
> > 
> > ---
> > If machine's thread gets excited (EXIT event is received),
> > we set thread->dead = true and it is later on removed from
> > machine's tree if the pid is reused on new thread.
> > 
> > We dont handle EXIT command in 'perf sched latency',
> > however the old thread is removed anyway when FORK
> > event is received for new thrad with same pid/tid.
> > ---

thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/