| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1446634365-25176-1-git-send-email-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 18:52:45 +0800
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/locking/core] atomics: Add test for atomic operations with _relaxed variants
Some atomic operations now have _relaxed/acquire/release variants, this
patch then adds some trivial tests for two purpose:
1. test the behavior of these new operations in single-CPU
environment.
2. make their code generated before we actually use them somewhere,
so that we can examine their assembly code.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
---
This is separated from the patchset of powerpc atomic variants implementation,
whose link is:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/26/141
Based on locking/core branch of the tip tree, tested by 0day.
lib/atomic64_test.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/atomic64_test.c b/lib/atomic64_test.c
index 83c33a5b..18e422b 100644
--- a/lib/atomic64_test.c
+++ b/lib/atomic64_test.c
@@ -27,6 +27,65 @@ do { \
(unsigned long long)r); \
} while (0)
+/*
+ * Test for a atomic operation family,
+ * @test should be a macro accepting parameters (bit, op, ...)
+ */
+
+#define FAMILY_TEST(test, bit, op, args...) \
+do { \
+ test(bit, op, ##args); \
+ test(bit, op##_acquire, ##args); \
+ test(bit, op##_release, ##args); \
+ test(bit, op##_relaxed, ##args); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define TEST_RETURN(bit, op, c_op, val) \
+do { \
+ atomic##bit##_set(&v, v0); \
+ r = v0; \
+ r c_op val; \
+ BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_##op(val, &v) != r); \
+ BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_read(&v) != r); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(bit, op, c_op, val) \
+do { \
+ FAMILY_TEST(TEST_RETURN, bit, op, c_op, val); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define TEST_ARGS(bit, op, init, ret, expect, args...) \
+do { \
+ atomic##bit##_set(&v, init); \
+ BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_##op(&v, ##args) != ret); \
+ BUG_ON(atomic##bit##_read(&v) != expect); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define XCHG_FAMILY_TEST(bit, init, new) \
+do { \
+ FAMILY_TEST(TEST_ARGS, bit, xchg, init, init, new, new); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define CMPXCHG_FAMILY_TEST(bit, init, new, wrong) \
+do { \
+ FAMILY_TEST(TEST_ARGS, bit, cmpxchg, \
+ init, init, new, init, new); \
+ FAMILY_TEST(TEST_ARGS, bit, cmpxchg, \
+ init, init, init, wrong, new); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define INC_RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(bit, i) \
+do { \
+ FAMILY_TEST(TEST_ARGS, bit, inc_return, \
+ i, (i) + one, (i) + one); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define DEC_RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(bit, i) \
+do { \
+ FAMILY_TEST(TEST_ARGS, bit, dec_return, \
+ i, (i) - one, (i) - one); \
+} while (0)
+
static __init void test_atomic(void)
{
int v0 = 0xaaa31337;
@@ -45,6 +104,18 @@ static __init void test_atomic(void)
TEST(, and, &=, v1);
TEST(, xor, ^=, v1);
TEST(, andnot, &= ~, v1);
+
+ RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(, add_return, +=, onestwos);
+ RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(, add_return, +=, -one);
+ RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(, sub_return, -=, onestwos);
+ RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(, sub_return, -=, -one);
+
+ INC_RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(, v0);
+ DEC_RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(, v0);
+
+ XCHG_FAMILY_TEST(, v0, v1);
+ CMPXCHG_FAMILY_TEST(, v0, v1, onestwos);
+
}
#define INIT(c) do { atomic64_set(&v, c); r = c; } while (0)
@@ -74,25 +145,10 @@ static __init void test_atomic64(void)
TEST(64, xor, ^=, v1);
TEST(64, andnot, &= ~, v1);
- INIT(v0);
- r += onestwos;
- BUG_ON(atomic64_add_return(onestwos, &v) != r);
- BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
-
- INIT(v0);
- r += -one;
- BUG_ON(atomic64_add_return(-one, &v) != r);
- BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
-
- INIT(v0);
- r -= onestwos;
- BUG_ON(atomic64_sub_return(onestwos, &v) != r);
- BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
-
- INIT(v0);
- r -= -one;
- BUG_ON(atomic64_sub_return(-one, &v) != r);
- BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+ RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(64, add_return, +=, onestwos);
+ RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(64, add_return, +=, -one);
+ RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(64, sub_return, -=, onestwos);
+ RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(64, sub_return, -=, -one);
INIT(v0);
atomic64_inc(&v);
@@ -100,33 +156,15 @@ static __init void test_atomic64(void)
BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
INIT(v0);
- r += one;
- BUG_ON(atomic64_inc_return(&v) != r);
- BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
-
- INIT(v0);
atomic64_dec(&v);
r -= one;
BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
- INIT(v0);
- r -= one;
- BUG_ON(atomic64_dec_return(&v) != r);
- BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
-
- INIT(v0);
- BUG_ON(atomic64_xchg(&v, v1) != v0);
- r = v1;
- BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
-
- INIT(v0);
- BUG_ON(atomic64_cmpxchg(&v, v0, v1) != v0);
- r = v1;
- BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+ INC_RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(64, v0);
+ DEC_RETURN_FAMILY_TEST(64, v0);
- INIT(v0);
- BUG_ON(atomic64_cmpxchg(&v, v2, v1) != v0);
- BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
+ XCHG_FAMILY_TEST(64, v0, v1);
+ CMPXCHG_FAMILY_TEST(64, v0, v1, v2);
INIT(v0);
BUG_ON(atomic64_add_unless(&v, one, v0));
--
2.5.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists