[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <563A4C9A.7000002@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 10:21:14 -0800
From: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@...aro.org>
To: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>, Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix div-by-zero case
On 11/3/2015 11:04 PM, Xi Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com> wrote:
>> case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
>> case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
>> + {
>> + const u8 r0 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_0];
>> +
>> + /* if (src == 0) return 0 */
>> + jmp_offset = 3; /* skip ahead to else path */
>> + check_imm19(jmp_offset);
>> + emit(A64_CBNZ(is64, src, jmp_offset), ctx);
>> + emit(A64_MOVZ(1, r0, 0, 0), ctx);
>> + jmp_offset = epilogue_offset(ctx);
>> + check_imm26(jmp_offset);
>> + emit(A64_B(jmp_offset), ctx);
>> + /* else */
>> emit(A64_UDIV(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
>> break;
>> + }
>> case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
>> case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
>
> BPF_MOD might need the same fix.
Agreed, and we may need add one more test cases in test_bpf module to
cover MOD?
Yang
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists