linux-kernel - [PATCH] genirq: delay incrementing interrupt count if it's disabled/pending

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1446661957-1019-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Date:	Wed,  4 Nov 2015 18:32:37 +0000
From:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Manoil Claudiu <claudiu.manoil@...escale.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: delay incrementing interrupt count if it's disabled/pending

In case of wakeup interrupt, irq_pm_check_wakeup disables the interrupt
and marks it pending and suspended, disable it and notifies the pm core
about the wake event. The interrupt gets handled later once the system
is resumed.

However the irq stats is updated twice: once when it's disabled waiting
for the system to resume and later when it's handled, resulting in wrong
counting of the wakeup interrupt when waking up the system.

This patch updates the interrupt count bit later so that it's updated
only when the interrupt gets handled. It's already handled correctly in
handle_edge_irq and handle_edge_eoi_irq.

Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reported-by: Manoil Claudiu <claudiu.manoil@...escale.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
---
 kernel/irq/chip.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
index e28169dd1c36..212b80f103f7 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -315,7 +315,6 @@ void handle_nested_irq(unsigned int irq)
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
 
 	desc->istate &= ~(IRQS_REPLAY | IRQS_WAITING);
-	kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);
 
 	action = desc->action;
 	if (unlikely(!action || irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data))) {
@@ -323,6 +322,7 @@ void handle_nested_irq(unsigned int irq)
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
+	kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);
 	irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
 
@@ -389,13 +389,13 @@ void handle_simple_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
 	desc->istate &= ~(IRQS_REPLAY | IRQS_WAITING);
-	kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);
 
 	if (unlikely(!desc->action || irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data))) {
 		desc->istate |= IRQS_PENDING;
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
+	kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);
 	handle_irq_event(desc);
 
 out_unlock:
@@ -439,7 +439,6 @@ void handle_level_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
 	desc->istate &= ~(IRQS_REPLAY | IRQS_WAITING);
-	kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);
 
 	/*
 	 * If its disabled or no action available
@@ -450,6 +449,7 @@ void handle_level_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
+	kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);
 	handle_irq_event(desc);
 
 	cond_unmask_irq(desc);
@@ -509,7 +509,6 @@ void handle_fasteoi_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
 		goto out;
 
 	desc->istate &= ~(IRQS_REPLAY | IRQS_WAITING);
-	kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);
 
 	/*
 	 * If its disabled or no action available
@@ -521,6 +520,7 @@ void handle_fasteoi_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);
 	if (desc->istate & IRQS_ONESHOT)
 		mask_irq(desc);
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/