linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 05 Nov 2015 11:44:47 +0300
From:	Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@...sung.com>
To:	'Krzysztof Kozlowski' <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	'Rob Herring' <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	'Pawel Moll' <pawel.moll@....com>,
	'Mark Rutland' <mark.rutland@....com>,
	'Ian Campbell' <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	'Kumar Gala' <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	'Kukjin Kim' <kgene@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for
 SMDK5410

 Hello!

> >>> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
> >>> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
> >>> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
> >>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html
> >>
> >> Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback
> >> and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest...
> >
> >  I have rechecked the original thread on archives and found nothing new. Where can
> > i read those feedbacks? Perhaps it makes sense for me to pick them up and include
> > into my set.
> 
> Go ahead. The only waiting feedback is at patch 2/5:
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330910.html
> Javier's pointed use of linux,stdout-path and putting xxti in
> exynos5410.dtsi (and customizing it per board if needed).
> 
> Patches already got reviews and acks so only 2/5 is the stopper.

 Ah, it's odroidXU device tree. Sorry, i don't have this particular board, and my patch actually doesn't need it. I could do some
blind modifications, but cannot test them, and this is out of my scope at all.
 As mentioned in the commit msg, i need only 0003 and 0004 from there. Can they be picked up independently? They don't need 0002 by
themselves, only 0005 needs it.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/