[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151105123243.47dda843@voom.fritz.box>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 12:32:43 +1100
From: David Gibson <dgibson@...hat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com>
Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, thuth@...hat.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: on crash, kexec'ed kernel needs all CPUs are
online
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:54:51 +0100
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 04/11/2015 13:34, Hari Bathini wrote:
> > On 10/16/2015 12:30 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> >> On kexec, all secondary offline CPUs are onlined before
> >> starting the new kernel, this is not done in the case of kdump.
> >>
> >> If kdump is configured and a kernel crash occurs whereas
> >> some secondaries CPUs are offline (SMT=off),
> >> the new kernel is not able to start them and displays some
> >> "Processor X is stuck.".
> >>
> >> Starting with POWER8, subcore logic relies on all threads of
> >> core being booted. So, on startup kernel tries to start all
> >> threads, and asks OPAL (or RTAS) to start all CPUs (including
> >> threads). If a CPU has been offlined by the previous kernel,
> >> it has not been returned to OPAL, and thus OPAL cannot restart
> >> it: this CPU has been lost...
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier<lvivier@...hat.com>
> >
> >
> > Hi Laurent,
>
> Hi Hari,
>
> > Sorry for jumping too late into this.
>
> better late than never :)
>
> > Are you seeing this issue even with the below patches:
> >
> > pseries:
> > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c1caae3de46a072d0855729aed6e793e536a4a55
Unfortunately, this is unlikely to be relevant - this fixes a failure
while setting up the kexec. The problem we see occurs once we've
booted the second kernel and it's attempting to bring up secondary CPUs.
> > opal/powernv:
> > https://github.com/open-power/skiboot/commit/9ee56b5
>
> Very interesting. Is there a way to have a firmware with the fix ?
From Laurent's analysis of the crash, I don't think this will be
relevant either, but I'm not sure. It would be very interesting to
know which (if any) released firmwares include this patch so we can
test it.
--
David Gibson <dgibson@...hat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Virtualization, Red Hat
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists