[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <563B6A4B.7090400@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 08:40:11 -0600
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Wei Fu <tekkamanninja@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Vipul Gandhi <vgandhi@...eaurora.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v8 5/5] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA
watchdog driver
Fu Wei wrote:
> Did you really read the "Note" above???????? OK, let me paste it again
> and again:
>
> SBSA 2.3 Page 23 :
> If a larger watch period is required then the compare value can be
> programmed directly into the compare value register.
Well, okay. Sorry, I should have read what you pasted more closely.
But I think that means during initialization, not during the WS0 timeout.
Anyway, I still don't like the fact that you're programming WCV in the
interrupt handler, but I'm not going to make a big deal about it any more.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists