linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] signal: kill the obsolete SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE check in complete

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151105160822.GA26017@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:08:22 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>, amanieu@...il.com,
	pmoore@...hat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	vdavydov@...allels.com, qiaowei.ren@...el.com, dave@...olabs.net,
	palmer@...belt.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] signal: kill the obsolete SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE check
	in complete_signal()

On 11/04, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:19:12 +0100 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > This explains WARN_ON(!JOBCTL_STOP_PENDING) in task_participate_group_stop()
> > triggered by the test-case from Dmitry:
> >
> > 	int main()
> > 	{
> > 		int pid = 1;
> > 		ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, pid, 0, 0);
> > 		ptrace(PTRACE_SETOPTIONS, pid, 0, PTRACE_O_EXITKILL);
> > 		sleep(1);
> > 		return 0;
> > 	}

...

> > The test-case above needs root and (correctly) crashes the kernel,

> I'm thinking this should be backported into -stable due to WARN_ONs and
> kernel crashes.

Ah, sorry for confusion. The kernel crash is fine/correct. Debugger kills
init process, the exiting init calls panic(). With or without this patch.
BTW, I always thought we should remove this panic(), but this is off-topic.

After this patch the test-case above still crashes the kernel, but without
warning ;)

> And as f008faff0e27 is from 2009, that means all
> kernels.

Yes, I think this change is safe for -stable. But the only visible problem
is WARN_ON_ONCE() in task_participate_group_stop(), so I am not sure...

Well. Actually there are more problems. zap_threads(), de_thread() can be
fooled by signal_group_exit() == F too. So a multi-threaded /sbin/init can
miss SIGKILL if it does execve(), or if it starts the coredump. But only if
SIGKILL was private (sent by tkill).

I do not see any serious problem this patch could fix.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/