lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151105160324.GF29259@esperanza>
Date:	Thu, 5 Nov 2015 19:03:24 +0300
From:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>
To:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: prepare page_referenced() and page_idle to new
 THP refcounting

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 05:26:15PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
...
> @@ -812,60 +812,104 @@ static int page_referenced_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	spinlock_t *ptl;
>  	int referenced = 0;
>  	struct page_referenced_arg *pra = arg;
> +	pgd_t *pgd;
> +	pud_t *pud;
> +	pmd_t *pmd;
> +	pte_t *pte;
>  
> -	if (unlikely(PageTransHuge(page))) {
> -		pmd_t *pmd;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * rmap might return false positives; we must filter
> -		 * these out using page_check_address_pmd().
> -		 */
> -		pmd = page_check_address_pmd(page, mm, address, &ptl);
> -		if (!pmd)
> +	if (unlikely(PageHuge(page))) {
> +		/* when pud is not present, pte will be NULL */
> +		pte = huge_pte_offset(mm, address);
> +		if (!pte)
>  			return SWAP_AGAIN;
>  
> -		if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
> +		ptl = huge_pte_lockptr(page_hstate(page), mm, pte);
> +		goto check_pte;
> +	}
> +
> +	pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address);
> +	if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
> +		return SWAP_AGAIN;
> +	pud = pud_offset(pgd, address);
> +	if (!pud_present(*pud))
> +		return SWAP_AGAIN;
> +	pmd = pmd_offset(pud, address);
> +
> +	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)) {
> +		int ret = SWAP_AGAIN;
> +
> +		ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
> +		if (!pmd_present(*pmd))
> +			goto unlock_pmd;
> +		if (unlikely(!pmd_trans_huge(*pmd))) {
>  			spin_unlock(ptl);
> +			goto map_pte;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (pmd_page(*pmd) != page)
> +			goto unlock_pmd;
> +
> +		if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
>  			pra->vm_flags |= VM_LOCKED;
> -			return SWAP_FAIL; /* To break the loop */
> +			ret = SWAP_FAIL; /* To break the loop */
> +			goto unlock_pmd;
>  		}
>  
>  		if (pmdp_clear_flush_young_notify(vma, address, pmd))
>  			referenced++;
> -
>  		spin_unlock(ptl);
> +		goto found;
> +unlock_pmd:
> +		spin_unlock(ptl);
> +		return ret;
>  	} else {
> -		pte_t *pte;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * rmap might return false positives; we must filter
> -		 * these out using page_check_address().
> -		 */
> -		pte = page_check_address(page, mm, address, &ptl, 0);
> -		if (!pte)
> +		pmd_t pmde = *pmd;
> +		barrier();

This is supposed to be

		pmd_t pmde = READ_ONCE(*pmd);

Right?

I don't understand why we need a barrier here. Why can't we just do

	} else if (!pmd_present(*pmd))
		reutnr SWAP_AGAIN;

?

Thanks,
Vladimir

> +		if (!pmd_present(pmde) || pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
>  			return SWAP_AGAIN;
> +	}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ