[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <563B8788.1090000@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 18:44:56 +0200
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Subject: Re: [v4.1.10-rt10][PATCH 1/2] genirq: introduce new
generic_handle_irq_rt_wa() api
Hi Thomas, Sebastian,
On 11/03/2015 10:18 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 11/03/2015 08:51 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> where MAX_MSI_IRQS = 32 now, but potentially can be increased up to 256.
>>
>> And you really oversimplified the code above. The reality is:
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < MAX_MSI_CTRLS: i++) {
>> u32 status = read_msi_ctrl(i);
>>
>> for_each_bit(status)
>> handle_irq();
>> }
>>
>> So sure, the worst case here is MAX_MSI_CTRLS * 32, but if all
>> possible 256 MSI interrupts are pending at the same time, you have
>> other problems than that.
>
> With threaded interrupts we would have 256 invocations of
> wake_up_process() so nothing should take ages.
>
Thanks a lot for your time and comments - I'll follow your
recommendations and use IRQF_NO_THREAD.
--
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists