[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <563BB8DF.7020908@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 21:15:27 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] CPPC-CPUFreq: Delete an unnecessary check before the function
call "kfree"
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 21:10:29 +0100
The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
index 93c219f..e8cb334 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
@@ -166,8 +166,7 @@ static int __init cppc_cpufreq_init(void)
out:
for_each_possible_cpu(i)
- if (all_cpu_data[i])
- kfree(all_cpu_data[i]);
+ kfree(all_cpu_data[i]);
kfree(all_cpu_data);
return -ENODEV;
--
2.6.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists