[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1511060656010.21658@east.gentwo.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 06:56:28 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
cc: htejun@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mgorman@...e.de
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] vmstat: Create our own workqueue
On Fri, 6 Nov 2015, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> So, if you refer to the blocking of the execution of vmstat updates,
> description for patch 3/3 sould be updated to something like below?
Ok that is much better.
> ----------
> Since __GFP_WAIT memory allocations do not call schedule()
> when there is nothing to reclaim, and workqueue does not kick
> remaining workqueue items unless in-flight workqueue item calls
> schedule(), __GFP_WAIT memory allocation requests by workqueue
> items can block vmstat_update work item forever.
>
> Since zone_reclaimable() decision depends on vmstat counters
> to be up to dated, a silent lockup occurs because a workqueue
> item doing a __GFP_WAIT memory allocation request continues
> using outdated vmstat counters.
>
> In order to fix this problem, we need to allocate a dedicated
> workqueue for vmstat. Note that this patch itself does not fix
> lockup problem. Tejun will develop a patch which detects lockup
> situation and kick remaining workqueue items.
> ----------
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists