[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151106130948.GD2651@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 13:09:48 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/mm changes for v4.4
On Thu, 05 Nov, at 11:05:35PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Admittedly, we might need to use a certain amount of care to avoid
> interesting conflicts with the vmap mechanism. We might need to vmap
> all of the EFI stuff, and possibly even all the top-level entries that
> contain EFI stuff (i.e. exactly one of them unless EFI ends up *huge*)
> as a blank not-present region to avoid overlaps, but that's not a big
> deal.
There shouldn't be any room for conflicting with vmap() because the VA
region where we map EFI regions is still carved out especially for us.
Right Boris?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists