linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf symbols/KCORE: Rebuild rbtree when adjusting symbols for kcore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <563CAC7F.4040302@huawei.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Nov 2015 21:34:55 +0800
From:	"Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	<lizefan@...wei.com>, <pi3orama@....com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf symbols/KCORE: Rebuild rbtree when adjusting symbols
 for kcore



On 2015/11/6 21:19, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 09:46:12AM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
>> In dso__split_kallsyms_for_kcore(), current code adjusts symbol's
>> address but only reinsert it into rbtree if the symbol belongs to
>> another map. However, the expression for adjusting symbol (pos->start -=
>> curr_map->start - curr_map->pgoff) can change the relative order between
>> two symbols (even if the affected symbols are in different maps, in
>> kcore case they are possible to share one same dso), which damages the
>> rbtree.
> Right, some code does change the symbol values it gets from whatever
> symtab (kallsyms, ELF, JIT maps, etc) when it should instead use the per
> map data structure (struct map) and its ->{map,unmap}_ip, ->pgoff,
> ->reloc, members for that :-\
>
> I.e. 'struct dso' should be just what comes from the symtab, while
> 'struct map' should be about where that DSO is in memory.
>
> With that in mind, do you still think your fix is the correct one?

Not very sure. I'm not familar with this part of code. Actually
speaking I don't understand the relationship between what you said
and what I found...

I spent a whole day to answer Masami's question that why
kernel_get_symbol_address_by_name success but __find_kernel_function()
fail in my platform, and described it in commit message.
This patch is the best one I can find. It solves my problem but may be
incorrect. Just want you and other know my result. Please let
me know if you and other want further information. Now its pirority
is low because patch 98d3b25 and Masami's update are already enough
for me.

I'll go back to BPF stuff. There are still much work to do :-)

Thank you.

> Adrian?
>
> - Arnaldo
>   


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/