linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] signal: kill the obsolete SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE check in complete

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151106143229.GC18528@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:32:29 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>, amanieu@...il.com,
	pmoore@...hat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	vdavydov@...allels.com, qiaowei.ren@...el.com, dave@...olabs.net,
	palmer@...belt.com, syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] signal: kill the obsolete SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE check
	in complete_signal()

On 11/05, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 21:17:20 +0100 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 11/05, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > Cough... and on the second thought this patch needs v2. Sorry Andrew, please
> > > drop signal-kill-the-obsolete-signal_unkillable-check-in-complete_signal.patch
> > > I'll send the updated version.
> > >
> > > With this patch the parent namespace can use any fatal signal (not only SIGKILL)
> > > to kill the init process in container. I do not think this is actually bad, but
> > > in any case this should not silently come as a side effect. And this is not
> > > consistent with SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE/sig_kernel_only() check in get_signal().
> > >
> > > Most probably I will just resend this patch as 2/2, while 1/2 will change
> > > sig_task_ignored() because afaics it is not actually right too (albeit not
> > > really buggy).
> >
> > So this replaces
> > signal-kill-the-obsolete-signal_unkillable-check-in-complete_signal.patch
> > 2/3 is actually the same change, just the changelog was updated.
>
> It's awfully late.  Do you see any reason why we should jam this into 4.4?

No, I think this can wait till 4.5.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/