[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151106161859.GS6087@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:19:00 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:12:14PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 12:30:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 09:37:51AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> > > FRAME_POINTER is defined in lib/Kconfig.debug, it is unnecessary to redefine
> > > it in arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug.
> >
> > It might be worth noting that this adds a dependency on DEBUG_KERNEL
> > for building with frame pointers. I'm ok with that (it appears to be
> > enabled in defconfig and follows the vast majority of other archs) but
> > it is a change in behaviour.
>
> We shouldn't have the dependency on DEBUG_KERNEL since we select
> ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS on arm64. However, the patch would allow one to
> disable FRAME_POINTERS (not sure it has any effect on the aarch64 gcc
> though).
Ah yes, you're right about DEBUG_KERNEL. I completely misread the brackets
and the left-associativity of &&/|| works out.
I still think Rutland has a valid point wrt junk frame pointers, though.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists