[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E37D991668@ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:21:41 +0000
From: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...ica.org" <devel@...ica.org>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] acpi: Use kstrtoul() instead of
strtoul()/simple_strtoul()
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Use kstrtoul() instead of
> strtoul()/simple_strtoul()
So, this would fix the issue(s) (in aclinux.h):
#define strtoul kstrtoul
strtoul is used frequently in with the ACPICA in-kernel AML Debugger:
dbcmds.c(188): Address = strtoul (InString, NULL, 16);
dbcmds.c(266): SleepState = (UINT8) strtoul (ObjectArg, NULL, 0);
dbcmds.c(1283): GpeNumber = strtoul (GpeArg, NULL, 0);
dbcmds.c(1291): BlockNumber = strtoul (BlockArg, NULL, 0);
dbdisply.c(213): Address = strtoul (Target, NULL, 16);
dbdisply.c(749): Handle = ACPI_TO_POINTER (strtoul (ObjectArg, NULL, 16));
dbexec.c(769): NumThreads = strtoul (NumThreadsArg, NULL, 0);
dbexec.c(770): NumLoops = strtoul (NumLoopsArg, NULL, 0);
dbhistry.c(292): CmdNum = strtoul (CommandNumArg, NULL, 0);
dbinput.c(1018): strtoul (AcpiGbl_DbArgs[1], NULL, 16);
dbinput.c(1026): AcpiGbl_DbDebugLevel = strtoul (AcpiGbl_DbArgs[1], NULL, 16);
dbinput.c(1060): Temp = strtoul (AcpiGbl_DbArgs[2], NULL, 0);
dbmethod.c(162): Address = strtoul (Location, NULL, 16);
dbmethod.c(249): Value = strtoul (ValueArg, NULL, 16);
dbmethod.c(271): Index = strtoul (IndexArg, NULL, 16);
dbmethod.c(381): NumStatements = strtoul (Statements, NULL, 0);
dbnames.c(334): MaxDepth = strtoul (DepthArg, NULL, 0);
dbnames.c(405): OwnerId = (ACPI_OWNER_ID) strtoul (OwnerArg, NULL, 0);
dbnames.c(411): MaxDepth = strtoul (DepthArg, NULL, 0);
dbnames.c(990): Address = strtoul (ObjectArg, NULL, 16);
dbtest.c(1046): Info.MaxCount = strtoul (CountArg, NULL, 0);
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:linux@...ck-us.net]
> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2015 1:19 AM
> To: Pavel Machek
> Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net; lenb@...nel.org; Moore, Robert; Zheng, Lv; linux-
> acpi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...ica.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Use kstrtoul() instead of
> strtoul()/simple_strtoul()
>
> On 08/02/2015 12:16 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon 2015-07-27 17:32:22, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> simple_strtoul() is deprecated; replace with kstrtoul() and
> kstrtouint().
> >> Return an error if the value passed to the sysfs attribute is not a
> >> number.
> >>
> >> Drop the definition of strtoul() since it is no longer needed.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> >> ---
> >> v2: An additional use of strtoul() was introduced with commit 4fa4616e.
> >> Replace it as well.
> >>
> >> drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpeinit.c | 5 +++--
> >> drivers/acpi/sysfs.c | 8 ++++++--
> >> include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h | 1 -
> >> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpeinit.c
> >> b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpeinit.c index ea4c0d3fca2d..aa1e8c1f2d4a
> >> 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpeinit.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpeinit.c
> >> @@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ acpi_ev_match_gpe_method(acpi_handle obj_handle,
> >> u32 gpe_number;
> >> char name[ACPI_NAME_SIZE + 1];
> >> u8 type;
> >> + int err;
> >>
> >> ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(ev_match_gpe_method);
> >>
> >> @@ -377,8 +378,8 @@ acpi_ev_match_gpe_method(acpi_handle obj_handle,
> >>
> >> /* 4) The last two characters of the name are the hex GPE Number
> >> */
> >>
> >> - gpe_number = strtoul(&name[2], NULL, 16);
> >> - if (gpe_number == ACPI_UINT32_MAX) {
> >> + er = kstrtouint(&name[2], 16, &gpe_number);
> >> + if (err < 0 || gpe_number == ACPI_UINT32_MAX) {
> >
> > Are you sure you compile-tested this?
> >
>
> I was, but maybe not ;-). Since the patch was rejected it does not really
> matter.
>
> Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists