[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <563CE5BB.2080701@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:39:07 -0800
From: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@...aro.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option
On 11/6/2015 9:35 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 09:23:38AM -0800, Shi, Yang wrote:
>> On 11/6/2015 8:25 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> However, the patch would allow one to
>>> disable FRAME_POINTERS (not sure it has any effect on the aarch64 gcc
>>> though).
>>
>> No, it doesn't. Actually, FRAME_POINTER could be disabled regardless of the
>> patch.
>
> In which case I suggest that we always select it just as a clearer
> statement that the feature cannot be disabled (and you never know what
> the compiler people decide to do in the future).
Do you mean select FRAME_POINTER in ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS?
Yes, we could, but this may cause other architectures which select
ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS to have FRAME_POINTER selected too.
Or we could do:
select FRAME_POINTER is ARM64
Thanks,
Yang
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists