[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151106174517.GA9315@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 12:45:17 -0500
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
vdavydov@...tuozzo.com, tj@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] mm: memcontrol: account socket memory on unified
hierarchy
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> The basic problem was that the Delegate feature has been backported to
> our systemd package without further consideration and that has
> invalidated a lot of performance testing because some resource
> controllers have measurable effects on those benchmarks.
You're talking about a userspace bug. No amount of fragmenting and
layering and opt-in in the kernel's runtime configuration space is
going to help you if you screw up and enable it all by accident.
> > All I read here is vague inflammatory language to spread FUD.
>
> I was merely pointing out that memory controller might be enabled without
> _user_ actually even noticing because the controller wasn't enabled
> explicitly. I haven't blamed anybody for that.
Why does that have anything to do with how we design our interface?
We can't do more than present a sane interface in good faith and lobby
userspace projects if we think they misuse it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists