linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.1 39/86] rbd: dont leak parent_spec in rbd_dev_probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20151106192207.299513579@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri,  6 Nov 2015 11:22:38 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
	Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 39/86] rbd: dont leak parent_spec in rbd_dev_probe_parent()

4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>

commit 1f2c6651f69c14d0d3a9cfbda44ea101b02160ba upstream.

Currently we leak parent_spec and trigger a "parent reference
underflow" warning if rbd_dev_create() in rbd_dev_probe_parent() fails.
The problem is we take the !parent out_err branch and that only drops
refcounts; parent_spec that would've been freed had we called
rbd_dev_unparent() remains and triggers rbd_warn() in
rbd_dev_parent_put() - at that point we have parent_spec != NULL and
parent_ref == 0, so counter ends up being -1 after the decrement.

Redo rbd_dev_probe_parent() to fix this.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
[idryomov@...il.com: backport to < 4.2: rbd_dev->opts]
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/block/rbd.c |   35 +++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -5148,41 +5148,36 @@ out_err:
 static int rbd_dev_probe_parent(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
 {
 	struct rbd_device *parent = NULL;
-	struct rbd_spec *parent_spec;
-	struct rbd_client *rbdc;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!rbd_dev->parent_spec)
 		return 0;
-	/*
-	 * We need to pass a reference to the client and the parent
-	 * spec when creating the parent rbd_dev.  Images related by
-	 * parent/child relationships always share both.
-	 */
-	parent_spec = rbd_spec_get(rbd_dev->parent_spec);
-	rbdc = __rbd_get_client(rbd_dev->rbd_client);
 
-	ret = -ENOMEM;
-	parent = rbd_dev_create(rbdc, parent_spec);
-	if (!parent)
+	parent = rbd_dev_create(rbd_dev->rbd_client, rbd_dev->parent_spec);
+	if (!parent) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out_err;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Images related by parent/child relationships always share
+	 * rbd_client and spec/parent_spec, so bump their refcounts.
+	 */
+	__rbd_get_client(rbd_dev->rbd_client);
+	rbd_spec_get(rbd_dev->parent_spec);
 
 	ret = rbd_dev_image_probe(parent, false);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out_err;
+
 	rbd_dev->parent = parent;
 	atomic_set(&rbd_dev->parent_ref, 1);
-
 	return 0;
+
 out_err:
-	if (parent) {
-		rbd_dev_unparent(rbd_dev);
+	rbd_dev_unparent(rbd_dev);
+	if (parent)
 		rbd_dev_destroy(parent);
-	} else {
-		rbd_put_client(rbdc);
-		rbd_spec_put(parent_spec);
-	}
-
 	return ret;
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/