linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm: Use kernel mm when updating section permissions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 Nov 2015 12:11:08 -0800
From:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:	info@...nelci.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
	Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Use kernel mm when updating section permissions

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:

[...]

> Hi Kevin and Kernel CI folks,
>
> Could lkdtm get added to the kernel-CI workflows? Extracting and
> validating Oops details when poking lkdtm would be extremely valuable
> for these cases. :)

Yeah, we can add that.

What arches should we expect this to be working on?  For starters
we'll get builds going with CONFIG_LKDTM=y, and then start looking at
adding the tests on arches that should work.

Thes will be an interesting failure modes to catch because a kernel
panic is actually a PASS, and a failure to panic is a FAIL.  :)

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/