[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMAWPa9XvdS+dF78c7Fgs4ekRy7wVnfFT=0A5NLpu0UYaqV7fA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 12:11:08 -0800
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: info@...nelci.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Use kernel mm when updating section permissions
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
[...]
> Hi Kevin and Kernel CI folks,
>
> Could lkdtm get added to the kernel-CI workflows? Extracting and
> validating Oops details when poking lkdtm would be extremely valuable
> for these cases. :)
Yeah, we can add that.
What arches should we expect this to be working on? For starters
we'll get builds going with CONFIG_LKDTM=y, and then start looking at
adding the tests on arches that should work.
Thes will be an interesting failure modes to catch because a kernel
panic is actually a PASS, and a failure to panic is a FAIL. :)
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists