lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151106192206.636796730@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri,  6 Nov 2015 11:22:24 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 25/86] mm: make sendfile(2) killable

4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>

commit 296291cdd1629c308114504b850dc343eabc2782 upstream.

Currently a simple program below issues a sendfile(2) system call which
takes about 62 days to complete in my test KVM instance.

        int fd;
        off_t off = 0;

        fd = open("file", O_RDWR | O_TRUNC | O_SYNC | O_CREAT, 0644);
        ftruncate(fd, 2);
        lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_END);
        sendfile(fd, fd, &off, 0xfffffff);

Now you should not ask kernel to do a stupid stuff like copying 256MB in
2-byte chunks and call fsync(2) after each chunk but if you do, sysadmin
should have a way to stop you.

We actually do have a check for fatal_signal_pending() in
generic_perform_write() which triggers in this path however because we
always succeed in writing something before the check is done, we return
value > 0 from generic_perform_write() and thus the information about
signal gets lost.

Fix the problem by doing the signal check before writing anything.  That
way generic_perform_write() returns -EINTR, the error gets propagated up
and the sendfile loop terminates early.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 mm/filemap.c |    9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2461,6 +2461,11 @@ again:
 			break;
 		}
 
+		if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
+			status = -EINTR;
+			break;
+		}
+
 		status = a_ops->write_begin(file, mapping, pos, bytes, flags,
 						&page, &fsdata);
 		if (unlikely(status < 0))
@@ -2498,10 +2503,6 @@ again:
 		written += copied;
 
 		balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(mapping);
-		if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
-			status = -EINTR;
-			break;
-		}
 	} while (iov_iter_count(i));
 
 	return written ? written : status;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ