linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.2 101/110] IB/cm: Fix rb-tree duplicate free and use-after-free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20151106191709.252149337@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri,  6 Nov 2015 11:19:48 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Doron Tsur <doront@...lanox.com>,
	Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2 101/110] IB/cm: Fix rb-tree duplicate free and use-after-free

4.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Doron Tsur <doront@...lanox.com>

commit 0ca81a2840f77855bbad1b9f172c545c4dc9e6a4 upstream.

ib_send_cm_sidr_rep could sometimes erase the node from the sidr
(depending on errors in the process). Since ib_send_cm_sidr_rep is
called both from cm_sidr_req_handler and cm_destroy_id, cm_id_priv
could be either erased from the rb_tree twice or not erased at all.
Fixing that by making sure it's erased only once before freeing
cm_id_priv.

Fixes: a977049dacde ('[PATCH] IB: Add the kernel CM implementation')
Signed-off-by: Doron Tsur <doront@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
@@ -873,6 +873,11 @@ retest:
 	case IB_CM_SIDR_REQ_RCVD:
 		spin_unlock_irq(&cm_id_priv->lock);
 		cm_reject_sidr_req(cm_id_priv, IB_SIDR_REJECT);
+		spin_lock_irq(&cm.lock);
+		if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&cm_id_priv->sidr_id_node))
+			rb_erase(&cm_id_priv->sidr_id_node,
+				 &cm.remote_sidr_table);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&cm.lock);
 		break;
 	case IB_CM_REQ_SENT:
 	case IB_CM_MRA_REQ_RCVD:
@@ -3112,7 +3117,10 @@ int ib_send_cm_sidr_rep(struct ib_cm_id
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cm_id_priv->lock, flags);
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&cm.lock, flags);
-	rb_erase(&cm_id_priv->sidr_id_node, &cm.remote_sidr_table);
+	if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&cm_id_priv->sidr_id_node)) {
+		rb_erase(&cm_id_priv->sidr_id_node, &cm.remote_sidr_table);
+		RB_CLEAR_NODE(&cm_id_priv->sidr_id_node);
+	}
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cm.lock, flags);
 	return 0;
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/