linux-kernel - Re: linux-next network throughput performance regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <563D1180.60206@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Nov 2015 13:45:52 -0700
From:	David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	Simon Xiao <sixiao@...rosoft.com>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next network throughput performance regression

On 11/6/15 1:31 PM, Simon Xiao wrote:
> I compared the network throughput performance on SLES12 bare metal servers, between SLES12 default kernel and latest linux-next (2015-11-05) kernel, based on the test results, I suspect there is a network regression exists on Linux-Next over the 40G Ethernet network:
> a) iperf3 reports 50% performance drop with single TCP stream on latest linux-next;
> b) iperf3 reports 10% ~ 30% performance drop with 2 to 128 TCP streams on latest linux-next;
> Another throughput benchmarking tool (ntttcp-for-linux) test result is also listed at the end of the email for reference.
>

Can you post your kernel config file?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/