[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151106212338.GA19557@google.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 21:23:38 +0000
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Mandeep Baines <msb@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/4] dm verity: add support for error
correction
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 10:05:24PM +0100, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> So how do you want to correctly 'restore' missing full sectors
> with just 0.8% data overhead ??
We use interleaving. Each byte in a 4k block is part of a different
Reed-Solomon block, which means an entire lost 4k data block looks like a
single error. When we also spread the bytes that form a single Reed-Solomon
block across the partition, we end up being able to correct several
megabytes of consecutive corrupted blocks with very small space overhead.
Sami
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists