[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151106215755.GC18797@mwanda>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 00:57:55 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Ivan Safonov <insafonov@...il.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Bryan Paul <bryan.paul@...oo.com>,
Vaishali Thakkar <vthakkar1994@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: rtl8188eu: if/else replaced by min_t
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 11:42:50PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Ivan Safonov <insafonov@...il.com> wrote:
> > psecuritypriv->authenticator_ie[0] = (unsigned char)psecnetwork->IELength;
> >
> > - if ((psecnetwork->IELength-12) < (256-1))
> > - memcpy(&psecuritypriv->authenticator_ie[1], &psecnetwork->IEs[12], psecnetwork->IELength-12);
> > - else
> > - memcpy(&psecuritypriv->authenticator_ie[1], &psecnetwork->IEs[12], (256-1));
> > + memcpy(&psecuritypriv->authenticator_ie[1], &psecnetwork->IEs[12], min_t(int, psecnetwork->IELength - 12, 256 - 1));
> >
>
> Run checkpatch.pl.
The long line was there in the original so it's forgivable but probably
should be changed in v2.
The main thing though is that this looks to introduce a memory
corruption but because the original used unsigned comparison and we have
changed it to doing "int" comparison. It should be u32 like in the
original code. Or size_t would be ok too.
>
> 256 looks like sizeof(…).
Yup.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists