[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151106220603.GD18797@mwanda>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 01:06:03 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Punit Vara <punitvara@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: wilc1000: Declare *wilc in init_wilc_driver to
fix build error
On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 03:29:23AM +0530, Punit Vara wrote:
> This patch is to the linux_wlan.c file that fixes declaration of *wilc
> to remove following error while building it.
>
> make drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.o
> drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c:1824:24: error: ‘wilc’ undeclared
>
Which patch broke the build? Use a Fixes tag.
> Signed-off-by: Punit Vara <punitvara@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
> index 2a5b36f..0805050 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
> @@ -1780,6 +1780,7 @@ int wilc_netdev_init(struct wilc **wilc)
> /*The 1st function called after module inserted*/
> static int __init init_wilc_driver(void)
> {
> + struct wilc *wilc;
> #ifdef WILC_SPI
> struct wilc *wilc;
> #endif
No that doesn't work at all. You should be testing these patches better
so you don't introduce more build breakages when you fix a different
build breakage. Sending this patch is a sign that something is wrong in
your test infrastructure.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists