linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] namei: prevent sgid-hardlinks for unmapped gids

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:48:26 -0800
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:	Theodore Tso <tytso@...gle.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	Dirk Steinmetz <public@...tdrjgfuzkfg.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk-manpages <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
	Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
	"security@...nel.org" <security@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] namei: prevent sgid-hardlinks for unmapped gids

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>>>> Adding Ted, who might know how this all hooks together. (The context
>>>> is that a write() or truncate() on a setgid file clears the setgid,
>>>> but mmap writes don't.)
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:29:55PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>>>>> Using "write" does kill the set-gid bit. I haven't looked at
>>>>>>> why.
>>>>>>> Al or anyone else, is there a meaningful distinction here?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I remember this one, I got caught once while trying to put a shell into
>>>>>> a suid-writable file to get some privileges someone forgot to offer me :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's done by should_remove_suid() which is called upon write() and truncate().
>>>>
>>>> file_remove_privs() seems to be the right entry point.
>>>> __generic_file_write_iter in mm/filemap.c calls it, though. Are these
>>>> callbacks not used for mmap writes?
>>>
>>> They're certainly not used early enough -- we need to remove suid when
>>> the page becomes writable via mmap (wp_page_shared), not when
>>> writeback happens, or at least not only when writeback happens.
>>
>> Well, I'm shy about the change there. For example, we don't strip in
>> on open(RDWR), just on write().
>
> I take it back. Hooking wp_page_shared looks expensive. :) Maybe we do
> need to hook the mmap?

But file_update_time already pokes at the same (or nearby) cachelines,
I think -- why would it be expensive?  The whole thing could be
guarded by if (unlikely(is setuid)), right?

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/