[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151107102309.GE12117@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 02:23:09 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/32] separate operations from flags in
the bio/request structs
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 10:53:39AM -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
> > If you have to touch submit_bio() and submit_bio_wait(), how about
> > requiring the callers of these functions to set the cmd and flags
> > arguments in the bio structure and to leave out the cmd and flags
> > arguments from the submit_bio() and submit_bio_wait() functions ? A
> > (compile tested only) patch that implements this idea is available at
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/2/173.
> >
>
> Yeah, I can do that.
I think this would be useful to do at the beginning of the series.
While this will have a huge trickle effect through the series it should
make thing a bit simpler overall. By leaving op 0 undefined it should
also help to create a nice error trap for unconverted code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists