| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <563E0DB6.3010704@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2015 22:41:58 +0800
From: Caesar Wang <caesar.upstream@...il.com>
To: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
CC: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] thermal: rockchip: improve the conversion function
Hello Eduardo,
在 2015年11月07日 03:00, Eduardo Valentin 写道:
> Hello Caesar,
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 01:18:00PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>> We should make the conversion table in as a parameter since the different
>> SoCs have the different conversionion table.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - make the conversion table in as a parameter both code_to_temp
>> and temp_to_code function.
>
> Now it looks cleaner. Thanks.
>
> The comments below are probably not directly on this change. You may
> want to add a different patch that takes care of the suggestions that
> follows.
Okay, I will send a another patch to fix it.
Thanks your reviewing this patch.
>> Series-changes: 1
>> - As Dmitry comment, make the conversion table in as a parameter.
>>
>> Changes in v1: None
>>
>> drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> index bdf7063..e828f18 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> @@ -58,6 +58,16 @@ enum sensor_id {
>> */
>> #define SOC_MAX_SENSORS 2
>>
>> +struct chip_tsadc_table {
>> + const struct tsadc_table *id;
>> +
>> + /* the array table size*/
>> + unsigned int length;
>> +
>> + /* that analogic mask data */
>> + unsigned long data_mask;
> Are you sure this need to be long?
Seem.....we should mark the 'unsigned int or u32'.
>> +};
>> +
>> struct rockchip_tsadc_chip {
>> /* The sensor id of chip correspond to the ADC channel */
>> int chn_id[SOC_MAX_SENSORS];
>> @@ -74,9 +84,14 @@ struct rockchip_tsadc_chip {
>> void (*control)(void __iomem *reg, bool on);
>>
>> /* Per-sensor methods */
>> - int (*get_temp)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, int *temp);
>> - void (*set_tshut_temp)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, long temp);
>> + int (*get_temp)(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> + int chn, void __iomem *reg, int *temp);
>> + void (*set_tshut_temp)(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> + int chn, void __iomem *reg, long temp);
> Temperature is currently represented as int not long in the thermal
> framework. You may want to send a different patch that normalize the
> temperature representation in your driver (long -> int).
Okay
>> void (*set_tshut_mode)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, enum tshut_mode m);
>> +
>> + /* Per-table methods */
>> + struct chip_tsadc_table table;
>> };
>>
>> struct rockchip_thermal_sensor {
>> @@ -172,21 +187,22 @@ static const struct tsadc_table v2_code_table[] = {
>> {3421, 125000},
>> };
>>
>> -static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(long temp)
>> +static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> + long temp)
> Same comment here.
Okay
>> {
>> int high, low, mid;
>>
>> low = 0;
>> - high = ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) - 1;
>> + high = table.length - 1;
>> mid = (high + low) / 2;
>>
>> - if (temp < v2_code_table[low].temp || temp > v2_code_table[high].temp)
>> + if (temp < table.id[low].temp || temp > table.id[high].temp)
>> return 0;
>>
>> while (low <= high) {
>> - if (temp == v2_code_table[mid].temp)
>> - return v2_code_table[mid].code;
>> - else if (temp < v2_code_table[mid].temp)
>> + if (temp == table.id[mid].temp)
>> + return table.id[mid].code;
>> + else if (temp < table.id[mid].temp)
>> high = mid - 1;
>> else
>> low = mid + 1;
>> @@ -196,25 +212,26 @@ static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(long temp)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(u32 code, int *temp)
>> +static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table, u32 code,
>> + int *temp)
> Here you are ok already.
>
>> {
>> unsigned int low = 1;
>> - unsigned int high = ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) - 1;
>> + unsigned int high = table.length - 1;
>> unsigned int mid = (low + high) / 2;
>> unsigned int num;
>> unsigned long denom;
>>
>> - BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) < 2);
>> + WARN_ON(table.length < 2);
>>
>> - code &= TSADCV2_DATA_MASK;
>> - if (code < v2_code_table[high].code)
>> + code &= table.data_mask;
>> + if (code < table.id[high].code)
>> return -EAGAIN; /* Incorrect reading */
>>
>> while (low <= high) {
>> - if (code >= v2_code_table[mid].code &&
>> - code < v2_code_table[mid - 1].code)
>> + if (code >= table.id[mid].code &&
>> + code < table.id[mid - 1].code)
>> break;
>> - else if (code < v2_code_table[mid].code)
>> + else if (code < table.id[mid].code)
>> low = mid + 1;
>> else
>> high = mid - 1;
>> @@ -227,10 +244,10 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(u32 code, int *temp)
>> * temperature between 2 table entries is linear and interpolate
>> * to produce less granular result.
>> */
>> - num = v2_code_table[mid].temp - v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp;
>> - num *= v2_code_table[mid - 1].code - code;
>> - denom = v2_code_table[mid - 1].code - v2_code_table[mid].code;
>> - *temp = v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp + (num / denom);
>> + num = table.id[mid].temp - v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp;
>> + num *= table.id[mid - 1].code - code;
>> + denom = table.id[mid - 1].code - table.id[mid].code;
>> + *temp = table.id[mid - 1].temp + (num / denom);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -290,20 +307,22 @@ static void rk_tsadcv2_control(void __iomem *regs, bool enable)
>> writel_relaxed(val, regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_CON);
>> }
>>
>> -static int rk_tsadcv2_get_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
>> +static int rk_tsadcv2_get_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> + int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
>> {
>> u32 val;
>>
>> val = readl_relaxed(regs + TSADCV2_DATA(chn));
>>
>> - return rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(val, temp);
>> + return rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(table, val, temp);
>> }
>>
>> -static void rk_tsadcv2_tshut_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, long temp)
>> +static void rk_tsadcv2_tshut_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> + int chn, void __iomem *regs, long temp)
> Here needs fixing.
Okay.
>
> BR,
>
> Eduardo Valentin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists