linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Staging: iio: Fix some character line limit coding style issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 7 Nov 2015 23:40:19 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Evan Hosseini <hosse005@....edu>, lars@...afoo.de,
	Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, jic23@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de,
	pmeerw@...erw.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: iio: Fix some character line limit coding style
 issues

On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 10:02:04AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 19:30 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The original is easier to read, sorry.  Checkpatch is a tool not the
> > king of the world to obeyed at all times.
> 
> Completely agree.
> 
> Perhaps there could be some comment indicators added
> to tell checkpatch to ignore certain warnings like
> 80 columns.

Applying or rejecting this patch was an easy call so it doesn't cause
decision fatigue or drain my emotions.  I feel like these patches are
instructional so people learn not to trust tools.  Checkpatch.pl is fine
as-is.

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/