linux-kernel - Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 07/10] staging: lustre: Handle nodemask on UMP machines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151107011229.GA14234@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Nov 2015 17:12:29 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	"Simmons, James A." <simmonsja@...l.gov>
Cc:	'kbuild test robot' <lkp@...el.com>,
	James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
	"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	James Simmons <uja.ornl@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
	"kbuild-all@...org" <kbuild-all@...org>,
	"lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org" <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 07/10] staging: lustre: Handle nodemask	on
 UMP machines

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 10:18:17PM +0000, Simmons, James A. wrote:
> >All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> >   In file included from include/linux/bitops.h:36:0,
> >                    from drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/../../include/linux/libcfs/linux/libcfs.h:44,
> >                    from drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/../../include/linux/libcfs/libcfs.h:40,
> >                    from drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/libcfs_cpu.c:38:
> >   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/libcfs_cpu.c: In function 'cfs_cpt_table_alloc':
> >>> arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h:64:5: warning: passing argument 2 of 'bset_mem_set_bit' from incompatible pointer type
> >        bset_mem_set_bit(nr, vaddr) : \
> >        ^
> >>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/libcfs_cpu.c:61:3: note: in expansion of macro 'set_bit'
> >      set_bit(0, &cptab->ctb_nodemask);
> 
> Yep and additional patch exist to fix this. Should I just push the fix for this or drop this patch and create
> a new patch that is combo of both fixes.
> 
> BTW Greg this new batch of patches are order independent. Sorry for not pointing that out. The rest of the
> patch appear to be okay.

Ok, I'll drop this one, and apply the rest, please resend this after you
have fixed it up.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/