[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1446975509.6006.116.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 09:38:29 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.2 108/110] pinctrl: baytrail: Serialize all register
access
On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 11:19 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
>
> commit 39ce8150a079e3ae6ed9abf26d7918a558ef7c19 upstream.
>
> There is a hardware issue in Intel Baytrail where concurrent GPIO register
> access might result reads of 0xffffffff and writes might get dropped
> completely.
>
> Prevent this from happening by taking the serializing lock in all places
> where it is possible that more than one thread might be accessing the
> hardware concurrently.
[...]
While I have no objection to this, I think a complete fix requires
adding mmiowb() before each spin_unlock.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
73.46% of all statistics are made up.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists