linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 08/28] lkl: system call interface and application API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7048391.CAJ2UxAV77@wuerfel>
Date:	Sun, 08 Nov 2015 11:26:22 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
Cc:	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Hajime Tazaki <thehajime@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/28] lkl: system call interface and application API

On Sunday 08 November 2015 05:49:00 Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > Could you use the standard numbers from include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h?
> > Maybe include that header and then #undef the ones you don't support?
> > That would avoid having to assign a new number of each future syscall
> > that gets added.
> 
> It would be nice to do that but if we undef them warnings will be
> generated during the build (e.g. "warning: #warning syscall pause not
> implemented"). Is there a way to disable those warnings?

Yes:

#define __IGNORE_restart_syscall
#define __IGNORE_exit
...

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/