[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151108114946.GG2255@suse.de>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 12:49:46 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] virtio DMA API core stuff
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I have no problem with that. For example, can we teach
> the DMA API on intel x86 to use PT for virtio by default?
> That would allow merging Andy's patches with
> full compatibility with old guests and hosts.
Well, the only incompatibility comes from an experimental qemu feature,
more explicitly from a bug in that features implementation. So why
should we work around that in the kernel? I think it is not too hard to
fix qemu to generate a correct DMAR table which excludes the virtio
devices from iommu translation.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists