[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE1zotLjngqdKnM+VZxBKag1Doqnp8VJy0U+2Kt6DC-ueA2HRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 06:16:39 +0200
From: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@...hat.com>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hajime Tazaki <thehajime@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/28] Linux Kernel Library
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> Am 04.11.2015 um 15:15 schrieb Octavian Purdila:
>> We could redefine the syscalls/libc symbols to call lkl_sys_ functions
>> in launch-lkl, e.g.:
>>
>> int opendir(const char *path)
>> {
>> return lkl_opendir(new_path)
>> }
>
> To get a better feeling how LKL behaves I've started with a tool
> to mount any Linux filesystem by FUSE.
> I.e. such that we can finally automount without root and bugs in filesystem
> code won't hurt that much.
>
> lkl_sys_fstatat64() uses the type struct lkl_stat64. Where is it defined?
> git grep is unable to locate it.
> At least it seems to be incompatible with my local struct stat.
>
> And why is there no lkl_sys_openat() syscall?
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists