[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAVeFuKpu3gtTwS6OMZiFEE7vrKEjrgnptXFbq+JqYKP0aBmDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:09:56 +0900
From: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: 104-idio-16: Use lowercase symbol names for const variables
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:28 AM, William Breathitt Gray
<vilhelm.gray@...il.com> wrote:
> On 11/08/2015 06:53 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> Apart from that this patch seems harmless and the repositioning of
>> some constant declarations is also welcome.
>
> I'll create a separate patch to reposition the constant declarations. Where in
> particular do you believe would be best for them to be positioned?
I was talking about what you did here:
@@ -109,24 +109,23 @@ static int __init idio_16_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct idio_16_gpio *idio16gpio;
+ const unsigned base = idio_16_base;
+ const unsigned extent = 8;
+ const char *const name = dev_name(dev);
int err;
- const unsigned BASE = idio_16_base;
- const unsigned EXTENT = 8;
- const char *const NAME = dev_name(dev);
So this is already done - sorry for not having been clear.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists