[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABXAfNJHAWd_ygUbcZXDqwGvaCxM3nA5ibOF4sNwzhA3AP=07g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 14:35:46 +0530
From: punit vara <punitvara@...il.com>
To: glen lee <glen.lee@...el.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, chris.park@...el.com,
Austin Shin <austin.shin@...el.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, johnny.kim@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony.cho@...el.com, leo.kim@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Staging: wilc1000: Fix build break due to undeclared
*wilc and implicit declaration of init_irq
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:25 PM, glen lee <glen.lee@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On 2015년 11월 09일 17:18, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 05:02:48PM +0900, glen lee wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Punit Vara,
>>>
>>> I cannot find build errors on my build machines.
>>>
>>> According the log which you have posted before says *wilc is undeclared
>>> in the function init_wilc_driver,
>>> which means WILC_SPI is selected because one of SPI or SDIO should be
>>> chosen at the moment.
>>> Hence, struct wilc *wilc should be compiled together.
>>> It looks like wilc1000 is compiled without SPI or SDIO.
>>>
>>> Of course, there are many cases that I don't know, so you could let me
>>> know the wilc1000 build configuration?
>>>
>>> static int __init init_wilc_driver(void)
>>> {
>>> #ifdef WILC_SPI
>>
>> This should be #ifndef WILC_SDIO
>
>
> I will do this in the next patch series.
>
>>
>>> struct wilc *wilc;
>>> #endif
>>
>> But the large question remains of why do we have this variable here any
>> way?
>
>
> As you pointed out, the variable is do-nothing for spi driver for now.
> After reworking SPI driver, the wilc will be passed to SPI as spi drive data
> like we already did in SDIO.
>
> We have done this to remove extern variable g_linux_wlan which is primary
> structure of wilc1000.
> For now it is not used, but need it not to break the build.
>
> static int linux_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func, const struct
> sdio_device_id *id)
> {
> struct wilc_sdio *wl_sdio;
> struct wilc *wilc;
>
> PRINT_D(INIT_DBG, "probe function\n");
> wl_sdio = kzalloc(sizeof(struct wilc_sdio), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!wl_sdio)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> PRINT_D(INIT_DBG, "Initializing netdev\n");
> local_sdio_func = func;
> if (wilc_netdev_init(&wilc)) {
> PRINT_ER("Couldn't initialize netdev\n");
> kfree(wl_sdio);
> return -1;
> }
> wl_sdio->func = func;
> wl_sdio->wilc = wilc;
> sdio_set_drvdata(func, wl_sdio);
>
> regards,
> glen lee.
>
>>
>> regards,
>> dan carpenter
>>
>
How about this patch @Dan and @glen ,For me it does not create any
build error. For #ifndef WILC_SDIO that pointer *wilc is not
compiling so that creates the error.
--- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static int dev_state_ev_handler(struct
notifier_block *this, unsigned long event
}
-#if (defined WILC_SPI) || (defined WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO)
+#if (defined WILC_SPI) || (defined WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO) || (!defined WIC_SDIO)
static irqreturn_t isr_uh_routine(int irq, void *user_data)
{
perInterface_wlan_t *nic;
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ irqreturn_t isr_bh_routine(int irq, void *userdata)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-#if (defined WILC_SPI) || (defined WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO)
+#if (defined WILC_SPI) || (defined WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO) || (!defined WILC_SDIO)
static int init_irq(struct net_device *dev)
{
int ret = 0;
@@ -1083,6 +1083,10 @@ static void wlan_deinitialize_threads(struct
net_device *dev)
}
}
+#if (!defined WILC_SDIO) || (defined WILC_SDIO_IRQ_GPIO)
+static int init_irq(struct net_device *dev);
+#endif
+
int wilc1000_wlan_init(struct net_device *dev, perInterface_wlan_t *p_nic)
{
wilc_wlan_inp_t nwi;
@@ -1791,7 +1795,7 @@ int wilc_netdev_init(struct wilc **wilc)
/*The 1st function called after module inserted*/
static int __init init_wilc_driver(void)
{
-#ifdef WILC_SPI
+#if (defined WILC_SPI) || (!defined WILC_SDIO)
struct wilc *wilc;
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists