[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1511091449560.3103@hadrien>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 14:50:47 +0000 (GMT)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] video: constify geode ops
structures
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Actually, it looks like Emese Revfy is going to merge the GCC plugin
> constify stuff sooner rather than later so maybe adding all these consts
> isn't going to be needed.
Is there any advantage of const over the plugin? The consts are easy to
add.
Does the plugin help for structures that have non-function fields?
julia
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists