[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yw1xpozj5ezj.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:12:16 +0000
From: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
To: Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Grafting old platform drivers onto a new DT kernel
Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr> writes:
> On 09/11/2015 16:40, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
>> The simplest solution for you is probably to add a quick and dirty DT
>> binding to the old driver. If it doesn't use any driver-specific
>> platform data struct, you only need to set .of_match_table in the
>> struct platform_driver. If there is a platform data struct, you'll also
>> need to write some code to populate it from DT properties. It shouldn't
>> take more than a few minutes per driver in most cases.
>
> I'll try that approach, although I fear that "a few minutes per driver"
> is an optimistic assessment.
If the driver only needs an MMIO region and an IRQ, it is literally five
lines of code.
--
Måns Rullgård
mans@...sr.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists