linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] arm64: cleanup FRAME_POINTER kconfig option and force to select it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:16:32 -0800
From:	"Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@...aro.org>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC:	will.deacon@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] arm64: cleanup FRAME_POINTER kconfig option and
 force to select it

On 11/9/2015 10:14 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:43:55AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>> According to the discussion on the mailing list, this version adds a new patch
>> to force select FRAME_POINTER for ARM64.
>>
>> Change v2 --> v1:
>> 1. Adds a new patch to force select FRAME_POINTER
>> 2. Notes that this change adds a dependency on DEBUG_KERNEL for building with
>> frame pointers
>>
>>
>> Yang Shi (2):
>>        arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option
>>        arm64: force to select FRAME_POINTER
>
> Do you really need two patches for this?

I just thought it may be clearer in this way. If nobody thinks it is 
necessary, I definitely could merge them into one.

Thanks,
Yang

>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/