[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2772927.crXiDc9cOV@phil>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 20:49:18 +0100
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Mark yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] drm: Introduce generic probe function for component based masters.
Hi Liviu,
Am Montag, 9. November 2015, 12:07:20 schrieb Liviu Dudau:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:03:35PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:57:27AM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > Meanwhile, what is your suggestion regarding the patchset. I've seen David has
> > > sent Linus a pull request for 4.4-rc1 that includes it. Should we send a
> > > revert for rockchip commit and then patch later the function?
> >
> > It definitely needs to be fixed, and I'd suggest its early enough in the
> > -rc cycle (which hasn't begun yet) to simply fix drm_of_component_probe()
> > to take two compare functions.
>
> I still don't have a Rockchip board to test the patch, so I need to find out
> someone willing to test them. Mark?
I of course also have a plethora of rockchip boards, so can test stuff
as well.
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists