[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABg9mcvACuVK2=GBbnur94CsckN2TXRCCiXhX7A8jYQ7arMM+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 12:00:29 -0800
From: Z Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>
To: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@...aro.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, daniel@...earbox.net,
Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix JIT stack setup
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Shi, Yang <yang.shi@...aro.org> wrote:
> I added it to stay align with ARMv8 AAPCS to maintain the correct FP during
> function call. It makes us get correct stack backtrace.
>
> I think we'd better to keep compliant with ARMv8 AAPCS in BPF JIT prologue
> too.
>
> If nobody thinks it is necessary, we definitely could remove that change.
Oh no, I don't think anyone will say it's unnecessary!
I agree the A64_FP-related change is a good idea, so stack unwinding works.
How about splitting this into two patches? One for the BPF-related
bug, and another for A64 FP-handling.
Thanks again for tracking this down and improving things overall for arm64 :)
>
> Thanks,
> Yang
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists