[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h7byf2O0YHDhKKtynGQ3cGb3sDoZZPerZe13VSLd35jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 18:42:31 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nvdimm tree with Linus' tree
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the nvdimm tree got a conflict in:
>
> block/ioctl.c
>
> between commits:
>
> d8e4bb8103df ("block: cleanup blkdev_ioctl")
> bbd3e064362e ("block: add an API for Persistent Reservations")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 49bfa9c5511e ("block: enable dax for raw block devices")
> abcc9ebd68ab ("block, dax: opt-in control for raw block dax support")
>
> from the nvdimm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
>
> Is that new stuff in the nvdimm tree really meant for v4.4? If not,
> please remove it until -rc1 has been released.
Done. I was indeed squeezing things into this window that I
shouldn't. I have postponed these conflicting patches to post 4.4.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists