[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1447133190.31884.65.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:26:30 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion
On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 18:18 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Which leaves the special case of Xen, where even preexisting devices
> don't bypass the IOMMU. Can we keep this specific to powerpc and
> sparc? On x86, this problem is basically nonexistent, since the IOMMU
> is properly self-describing.
>
> IOW, I think that on x86 we should assume that all virtio devices
> honor the IOMMU.
You don't like performances ? :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists