linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] memcg/kmem: switch to white list policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151110074914.GQ31308@esperanza>
Date:	Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:49:14 +0300
From:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] memcg/kmem: switch to white list policy

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 03:30:53PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
...
> Hmm.... can't we simply merge among !SLAB_ACCOUNT and SLAB_ACCOUNT
> kmem_caches within themselves?  I don't think we'd be losing anything
> by restricting merge at that level.  For anything to be tagged
> SLAB_ACCOUNT, it has to have a potential to grow enormous after all.

OK, I'll prepare v2 which will introduce SLAB_ACCOUNT and add it to
SLAB_MERGE_SAME. Let's see what slab maintainers think of it.

Thanks,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/