linux-kernel - [patch] ncpfs: don't allow negative timeouts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151110090924.GB2934@mwanda>
Date:	Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:09:24 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Petr Vandrovec <petr@...drovec.name>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] ncpfs: don't allow negative timeouts

This code causes a static checker warning because it's a user controlled
variable where we cap the upper bound but not the lower bound.  If
someone passes us a negative timeout then I guess lets set it to the
default.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

diff --git a/fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c b/fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
index 79b1130..c07498a 100644
--- a/fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static long __ncp_ioctl(struct inode *inode, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg
 			switch (rqdata.cmd) {
 				case NCP_LOCK_EX:
 				case NCP_LOCK_SH:
-						if (rqdata.timeout == 0)
+						if (rqdata.timeout <= 0)
 							rqdata.timeout = NCP_LOCK_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT;
 						else if (rqdata.timeout > NCP_LOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT)
 							rqdata.timeout = NCP_LOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/